Compare

Arete vs Parker Dewey

Parker Dewey is useful when you want access to short-term, paid professional micro-internships at real companies.

Arete is different: it helps you build role-specific proof even before you are selected for an opportunity, and it captures the reasoning behind your work.

Which one fits

Parker Dewey is best if

  • You want to apply for short paid projects
  • You want real employer work experience
  • You are ready to compete for available opportunities

Arete is best if

  • You need to build evidence before applications
  • You want your reasoning and strengths to be visible
  • You want proof shaped around your target role

Side by side

Where the two differ.

Arete compared with Parker Dewey
CriterionAreteParker Dewey
Starts from your CV and target roleAreteYesParker DeweyNo
Requires being selected before you can startAreteNoParker DeweyYes
Builds personalised proofAreteYesParker DeweyDepends on the project
Captures how you thinkAreteYesParker DeweyLimited
What you come away withAreteA reusable proof profileParker DeweyPaid project experience
Connects to opportunitiesAreteHackathons and a proof profileParker DeweyMicro-internship projects

Parker Dewey helps you find short projects. Arete helps you become easier to understand: what you can do, how you think, and why you are ready.